Gay Lover Falls From Roof. It Could Happen To You — just like Judy Holliday.

Remember back in the old days when the way to get maudlin attention at a funeral was to throw one’s self onto the casket and scream?  Remember that?  People probably still do it all the time, but the technology today has digitized these agonizing moments and taken them a step further — and just a teeny bit faker.

Instead of throwing themselves on caskets and moaning to the heavens, “Take me, God!  Why don’t you take me,” people are throwing themselves and the images of their departed loved ones onto the internet.  YouTube has become the modern day casket.  Why not?  It’s free and it never rots.

It’s being used by everybody who wants to cry, complain, grieve, offer false or insipid inspiration — you name it — all the maudlin junk you can imagine at an Irish wake  or an Italian repast is now on YouTube — and it’s getting more and more cringe-worthy every day

Back in the 1950s, the late, great actress/singer/comedienne Judy Holliday made a famous film called, “IT SHOULD HAPPEN TO YOU.”  In this film she plays a woman named Gladys Glover; an ordinary gal who makes herself famous simply by plastering her image on billboards throughout New York City.

How blissfully ignorant and ironic that the title from that film is eerily close to the title of the newest YouTube sensation about a gay guy –who seems to want to be famous — and the lover – who also seems to have wanted fame — that he lost one year ago when said lover fell off a roof.

You’ve probably read the story already and you’ve probably seen the video because every bird-brain on your Facebook page is passing it around and talking about how sad it is and how every gay person in the world needs to revolt because nobody seems to want them at a funeral, and everybody is a bully, and everybody is a hater, and everybody is an evil Christian who watches Fox News.

One deeply saddened gay activist wrote:  “This is why we have to fight back!  I can’t stop watching this.  It brings tears to my eyes. I can’t stop crying.  It’s terrible.”

If it’s so terrible and it makes you cry, why the hell do you keep watching it and sending it to your friends?  Are you a maudlin YouTube masochist first and a Facebook sharing sadist second?  Perhaps you’re organizing a big pity party with go-go boys?  Or maybe…just maybe, you’re just a dopey, maudlin, simple-minded provincial dingbat?  Yes, I think the last guess is the right one.

Anyway, Shane Bitney Crone is the first gay mourner to officially throw himself onto the  virtual casket of YouTube with his teary commemorative video, “It Could Happen To You.”  Dammit — he was so close to getting the title right!  Judy Holliday’s movie was called, “It Should Happen To You” which I happen to think is more appropriate in this case, but I can’t be that mean.

Keep in mind that Shane Bitney Crone did this because he is sad and horribly repressed by our ever evil and perpetually cruel heterosexual Christian society. (yawn) He years for the day when he can move to a Muslim country where he can openly mourn the death of his gay lover.

Hey!  Maybe….just maybe, he’s a modern-day Gladys Glover and he simply wants to be famous.  Oh, no, no, no!  Momma Mia let me go!  Nobody is that shameless, are they?

Shane Bitney Crone made this video — a video that ranks up there with “Old Yeller” for people who like to cry at the movies — because he wanted people to know that his gay lover was accidentally killed and that this gay lover’s evil family shunned him from the ceremony when they had to bury their son.

Oh, I forgot to tell you the actual back story.  It goes something like this.

Shane Bitney Crone’s longtime boyfriend, Tom Bridegroom, fell from a rooftop and died during a photo shoot.  People who seek fame often do photo-shoots because you have to have headshots of yourself in edgy places — like grungy roofops and stuff.

Notwithstanding the glaring fact that both these guys have names that sound like they both stepped off the Mayflower, it has been alleged by Shane Bitney Crone that Tom Bridegroom’s family would not allow him to mourn properly.  This is an outrage and something that should never happen in such high-bourne society.

In a crying-jag performance worthy of Lana Turner, circa “Madam X” and/or “Imitation Of Life,”  he describes in his video how he was pushed aside by those evil anti-gay heterosexual monsters – aka, his ersatz in-laws.

So now, thanks to the world’s newest “Gladys Glover Show” that’s playing at a Facebook page near you, the gay world is on the verge of kvetching.  Does the maudlin gullibility of the facebooking and YouTubing human being ever end?  Unfortunately, the answer is, no.

Is it sad that the guy died?  Of course it is.  Is it sad that Shane was allegedly dismissed by the family of the dead lover?  Yes it is.  Is the whole thing totally true as it as been told in the over-played, tear-jerker YouTube video?  Uh…probably not, but you have to allow for a little poetic/dramatic license.

Keep in mind that a video on YouTube is only half as effective as a real-life, black-veiled, old lady wailing and throwing herself onto her husband’s coffin, but you need production value, dude, and Shane Bitney Crone seems to have done a great job of making himself a YouTube martyr/hero — an internet Gladys Glover — and in HD no less.

I don’t, however, recommend watching the dead lover YouTube video.  Go out instead and rent or buy the Judy Holliday film  “IT SHOULD HAPPEN TO YOU ” – the acting is a whole lot better.

Damien LeGallienne reporting for: TheDamienZone.com.

Undecided Films Announces: “Angie Cumming is Coming…”

Undecided Films, LLC announced this week that they are currently in development for an Angie Cumming web series based off the short “Angie Goes On A Date” created by James Di Giacomo.

Undecided Films, LLC is currently meeting with investors who are interested in funding this unconventional “Untitled Angie Cumming” project as a cable series.

Presently, 6 to 12 webisodes are shooting, and the web series will be launched on the various websites that cater to webisodes.

The “Untitled Angie Cumming Project” will then use the  60-plus minutes of footage and turn it into a 30-minute pilot presentation that will be submitted to networks like Comedy Central, IFC, LOGO and several other premium channels.

James Di Giacomo has brought in an off-beat writer and rumors are that the scripts thus far are nothing short of hilarious.  TheDamienZone.com has read the first three and we thought it was awesome.

“It’s really an ambitious project but I think we’ve done a great job with it,” James Di Giacomo said from his home in Burbank.

“I snagged a really great writer too.  Somehow I managed to convinced Dave Mattia to join write for the show.  He’s a guy who is famous for his writing in the  horse racing business, but he’s also written some screenplays that I thought were great.  Two of his more recent scripts are in development and one of them – a thing called ‘GOUGE’– is really incredible.  That script could easily turn into an instant hit film, so I wanted to get Dave before I could no longer afford him and he went all Hollywood on me.

“Dave wasn’t available when I did the original short film ‘Angie Goes On A Date’ but he’s totally on board now.  His stuff is always really funny or super creepy so I asked him if he wanted to work on the Angie project, and he was like…okay?  I thought he was joking.  I didn’t think he would actually say he’d do it.

“Anyway, we work really well together and its funny how totally different we are when we approach comedy.  I’m really happy with the way this has turned out.”

We here at TheDamienZone caught a glimpse of some of Angie Cumming’s stuff, and as much as we usually hate everything, the scripts we saw were actually very funny, and if they come off on screen as well as they do on paper, this show will be a complete riot.

We like to think we know what’s good and what isn’t.  Very few comedy shows are super funny on paper because their ultimate appeal depends on the performances of the actors, but this one is very funny – straight from the printer.

“I think that once people get a taste for Angie, they might want to gargle, ” said  Di Giacomo with a chuckle.   “That pretty much sums up her character…or lack of character.”

TheDamienZone agrees with the show’s young producer/actor, and that’s especially why we like what we know so far — and we always know more than you do.  Sorry, but that’s true.

Angie Cumming, the title character, is a third-string Hollywood gossip reporter who lives a lonely life with her “artistic” son, her train-wreck of a mother, and pretty much nothing else but pathetic misadventure.  Somehow James Di Giacomo has made this nothingness into something and it might be worth taking a look at it when it is released sometime this fall.

If you want to learn more about James Di Giacomo click here  http://www.imdb.me/jamesdigiacomo - and if you want to learn about his awesome production company click here www.undecidedfilms.com - and if you REALLY want to know about the wild Angie project, here’s a link you might want to look at:  http://igg.me/p/94461?a=548706

Why I switched to Geico – A letter from a reader.

Recently a reader sent me a copy of a letter that he had sent to his car insurance company in New Jersey.  We’ve all seen the Geico gecko commercials, and the average person might think that Geico is some cheapo company, but actually, it’s been around since 1936 and it’s a very solid company.  Your solid as a rock insurance carrier might have you believe that Geico is a “fly by night” company — and while there certainly are “fly by night” companies — Geico is not one of them.  Sometimes you hear the names of iconic insurance companies and assume that they are great companies — wrong.  Here is a letter from a reader — use your own judgement.

Dear Plymouth Rock:

You may have noticed that I recently switched to another insurance carrier — why did I do this?  My intention is not to insult your company, but rather, it’s more of a primer about how you should treat your customers.  Primarily, over the 13 years I was a client — first you were Prudential (my piece of the rock) but then I suddenly found myself insured by  High Point.  Isn’t that a state park in New Jersey?  Then, a few years later my new policy said I was insured by  Plymouth Rock.  Who the heck is that?   What happened to Prudential?

I often asked your reps why I was paying so much more than my friends and acquaintances.  I had a flawless driving record whereas many of my friends had tickets and wrecks. For several years I had a car that was paid in full and I dropped collision and other side-dishes, but still I was paying more than friends who had fancy new cars with FULL coverage.  I asked a hundred times, “Why?” 

The reps were always polite but they never really answered the question.  I was twice told that I was free to shop around for a better deal, and finally, after a lot of high-paying years, I did.

I’m glad I did because now, with the same exact coverage, I am paying LESS than half of what I was paying Plymouth Rock aka High Point aka Prudential. 

The thing that pushed me over the edge was a call I made to Plymouth Rock not too long ago — another call where I asked about my high rates and cheaper rates I was quoted by other companies. The answer I got from a very pleasant rep was disturbing.  It was suggested that other companies were “fly by night.” — One rep said, “What if you get in an accident and spend months in the hospital and were paralyzed, or what if you were to run over a kid on a bicycle?”  

That was very unpleasant to hear, and that silly remark notwithstanding, if you’re going to call another company “fly by night” how do you explain that while I was with you, I never really knew who my insurance company really was?  Like I said, one year it was Prudential and then a few years later it was High Point and then more recently it was Plymouth Rock.  I never received any information or notification of these changes. 

The company I switched to has had the same name for over 75 years.  So, aside from the extreme savings for the same coverage, I simply did not like the way my business was simply “taken” — I figured that I was overcharged by about $15,000 since 1999.   Sincerely **** ********.

TheDamienZone wonders if this company will respond.   Please note that not everyone is happy with Geico, but I am not happy with my local wine shop, so it’s all relative.  Not everyone saves money by switchin to Geico, but this guy did, and he did a great job of telling his story.

If a rep from Plymouth Rock wants to know who sent me this, I have their permission to tell you.

 

“I’m Christian, Unless You’re Gay” Facebook thing – FAKE! HOAX!

WRITER’S NOTE:  THE ESSAY PICTURED ON THE RIGHT IS MY FEEBLE ATTEMPT AT MOCKING THE ACTUAL LETTER WRITTEN BY THE “BRAVE GAY BOY” WHO DOESN’T REALLY EXIST!  IT’S HOW I IMAGINE THE ESSAY SHOULD LOOK.

[Damien LeGallienne]

Just when I was finally content with the knowledge that nothing could ever be as grotesquely maudlin as the white trash CB Radio trucker Christmas song about the “Poor Little Crippled Boy,”  god went and struck me down by bringing along something a whole lot worse.  Now I have to start all over again.

I humbly submit for your approval, my take on the latest Facebook “share” sensation — the totally fake story about the poor little –  but not crippled –  gay boy who wrote into a poor little mentally crippled blogger.  The sappiness is outweighed only by the fakeness.  ENJOY! 

Yes, now the gay folks —  people who are usually pretty smart about being scammed on Facebook —  have fallen victim to the latest hoax — and it was brought down upon them by their own kind.  Yes, other gays, or, in this case, a blogging “daddy” who pretends to care oh-so-much about gay kids. (sigh)

It’s an amateurishly maudlin story (is there any other kind) about a mother who contacts one of those oh-so-caring simpletons after she stumbles upon an essay where her 15-year-old son comes out as gay after getting an assignment from his evil Christian teacher:

Don’t get nervous, folks.  It’s all fake — totally.  You will eventually see it on your Facebook page because we all have a few morons on our Facebook pages — people who like to “share” thoughtful and insightful….and FAKE stories.

This FAKE blog that some of your dumber gays and a few dysfunctional mothers who shop for craft supplies at “Michael’s”  are spreading around Facebook, was written not to help gay kids or to bring hope to young people who grapple with issues about a budding sexual identity crisis.  God no!  Do not fool yourself into believing that for one second.  No! No! No!  It was written simply to blast Christians and to manipulate the social consciousness of the average person who is dumb enough to believe it’s a true story.

Are there gay kids who are sad because they are stuck in a Christian Fundamentalist school?  Of course there are, but the story used to get that message across is fake.

There are gay kids stuck in Yeshivas and Mosques and Amish country too, but you will not read about that.  Why bother to lend a hand to those kids when you can — Bash the Christians — it gets attention; mostly from other former Christians and the new Nazi atheist misfits who think atheism is a religion.

The only thing these people hate more than themselves is truth — but the self-loathing is a huge issue too.  We can’t ignore that.  One should have some degree of compassion for these idiots.  After all, we are civilized beings.

The blogger, who I will not name because he’s a dick-weed of the highest order, forgot to write the story about the gay school kid in Iran who got his head chopped off in the street because he wrote a love letter to another boy.  Nah –who cares about that atrocity?  It’s so much easier to mock the Christians and get stupid people to pass along the link on their Facebook page.  After a milion cretins share the emotional moment, and you make money off your fuktard blog, the damage is done.  Don’t you just love the Bossa Nova, Dolores?

Anyway, kindly note that I am not directing you to the blogger because he is a complete jerk-off who needs a good what ‘fer.

I imagine that you’ll find him all by yourself, and then some of you will write me nice comments while others will say things like, “Are you off your meds?”  or “You’re pathetic!” or “Do you write this from your mom’s basement?”  — the usual stuff.  If you’re gonna hate on me, BE ORIGINAL GODAMMIT!!!

And you know what really ticks me off?  This blogger is the kind of guy who could, in all probability,  cause a gay teen to kill himself.  Yes! You think I’m crazy, but yes!

Some gay kid might read that fake story and say to himself, “Gee, my mother doesn’t care as much about me as that lady who wrote into the blog about the other gay Christian kid.”  Then a few hours later the police are dragging the river under the Hooterville Bridge and people sob, “Why?  Why?”

Of course, the blogger did not think about this when he invented the story or perhaps passed along the invented story. He only wanted to be viral on Facebook — and that’s all that matters.  This kind of shit sooooooooo infuriates me.

Let me tell you people something.  You might find my blog and read this,  and then perhaps you’ll read through other articles in my blog and come away with the notion that I am some kind of idiot — I can accept that.  I often TRY to be an idiot so as to expose idiots  – not always, but often.

I am, however, a very professional writer for two major publications and I pretty much put absolutely no effort into writing this shit other than to research the basics I feel in my keenly perceptive gut, and I quickly write down the truth.

I work on this without an editor between real assignments, and I will probably write this entire piece in about 5 minutes ( it took me nearly 7 because I had to calm down).

The point about being a good writer, a really good one like me, is that you can easily spot when other writers are simply competent or ordinary.  In this case it was obvious.  The writer who pulled this stunt (playing both the part of the mother and the gay teen) can write well enough for a local Community Newsletter, but he has no imagination.  He’s a hack who can only write in one voice — he’s Salieri — I am Mozart for chrissakes.

I can easily hear the same “voice” in both the mother’s plaintiff email and the son’s woeful essay.  In other words, as a writer, I am able to detect that both pieces of shit were written by the same piece of shit — catch on?

We writers have what we call a “voice.”  Good ones — like me of course – know how to change that voice.  Sure, anyone can switch over to making spelling errors and grammatical mistakes so as to sound like a kid or a different person, but the VOICE is still there.  I am so good at changing my voice that I often have to convince editors in my real job that the stuff I submit is genuine.

The blogger I am talking about — the one with the sad, fake, gay teenager — does not have this ability.  He simply knows how to put a story together.  It’s like learning how to load the dishwasher — anybody with arms or hooks can do it.

The hand-wringing mother in this tale is a windbag – notwithstanding the fact that she is an imaginary character —  because she not only went through her kid’s paperwork, she told the whole world, or the 50 people who read that blog, that she was shocked when she read her son’s essay where he talks about his gayness (yawn).

Here’s the thing, it’s a sappy sentimental letter sent to, or totally invented by, a blogger who posts stupid inspirational crap…even if it’s fake.  He doesn’t care — he needs the traffic — who cares if the whole frigging story is a lie?

The picture of the kid  is outrageously fake — I won’t even put up the picture — it is so fake that I pray the perky kid who posed for the picture was well paid because, believe me, it’s not a picture of the kid who wrote the essay about being gay.  As a matter of fact, no kid wrote the essay.  Again, the entire thing — the mother who wrote the story about the essay and the essay itself — was written by the same person.  Both letters have the same voice.  The whole things is poorly done because it’s all done so perfectly….or what an ordinary writer would consider to be perfect.

I am going to do one of these fake, maudlin, pitiful stories one day to prove how anyone can fake a story or a letter — I mean, I do it every day but I do it to be funny and I often get a riotous laugh out of it.

Let me give you an example of why some writers are good and some writers are bad and some writers are just average.

I often quote ”experts” on my blog — people who don’t even exist — and still they get emails from TV morning shows and radio shows asking them to appear as guests.  You might suggest that I am no better than the blogger who did this — WRONG!   I do it it to be obviously stupid.  I do not do it to manipulate and lie.  The TV shows and radio producers who call upon my “experts”  should be fired for being so stupid as to believe my experts.

So, think about it.  If I can get mainstream press about something as crazy as Snooki working for the CIA, how easy would it be for someone to post some sappy and sentimental story about a poor, poor, gay kid who was forced out of the closet by a mean Christian teacher?  Are you following me?

These crazy, Facebook sharers and those who enable them and encourage them are dangerous people because they are creating a race of internet morons who will believe anything.

OLBERMANN FIRED! SENT TO MENTAL HOSPITAL!

Keith Olbermann was gone, a new host had replaced him, and history seemed to have repeated itself with his dismissal from Current TV after less than a year.   Olberman was taken away by security guards at the Current TV offices and his desk was put in the parking lot along with boxes of his personal items.    He had to be carted away to Dr. Dean Traherne MD – a local psychiatrist, who admitted Olberamnn into an undisclosed nuthouse where, dressed as a woman, he raced around inisting that Rachel Maddow was his husband.

The left-leaning cable network announced just hours before airtime on Friday that “Countdown,” the show Olbermann had anchored on Current since June, would be replaced with a new program hosted by former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer, beginning that night.   Spitzer, a whore, was deemed to be better than a lunatic who pisses in his pants and on the floor during live broadcasts.

“Welcome to Current’s new 8 p.m. (Eastern time) show, ‘Viewpoint,’” said Spitzer, who had a short-lived talk show on CNN in that same time slot, where he briefly went up against Olbermann. He did not mention Olbermann on Friday’s premiere of “Viewpoint.”   He was standing in the sticky remnants left behind when Olbermann used to pee down his leg and leave it for the Cuban maid to clean up.  Nobody believed the old lady until Sarah Palin went public with the fact that Keith Olbermann peed behind his desk.

The sometimes volatile Olbermann came to Current last year as the centerpiece of its new prime-time initiative after a stormy eight-year stint at MSNBC — his second at that network— followed by his abrupt departure in January 2011.   MSNBC fired him in an instant after they simply started to hate him.  He was peeing on the floor and acting like a crazy person.

Shortly after, Current announced his hiring — reportedly with a five-year, $50-million contract — as the start of an effort to transform the network’s prime-time slate into progressive talk. His official title was chief news officer, charged with providing editorial guidance for all of the network’s political news, commentary and current events programming.    Olbermann’s contract was chock full of standards and practices loppholes so he isn’t going to get any money out of that $50 million.

In a statement, Current TV founders Al Gore and Joel Hyatt said the network was “founded on the values of respect, openness, collegiality, and loyalty to our viewers. Unfortunately these values are no longer reflected in our relationship with Keith Olbermann and we have ended it.”     They also said off the record that NOBODY was watching the network and that Al Gore had lost millions of his wife’s money trying to compete with Bill O’Reilly.

They offered no details, but it is known that the temperamental Olbermann repeatedly clashed with his employers and peed on the floor. During the primary season he declined to host certain hours of election coverage and has missed a number of regular broadcasts, as well as complaining about technical problems he said undermined his show — and he pissed on the floor.

Current considered some of those missed shows to be in “serial, material breach of his contract,” terming them “unauthorized absences,” according to a person familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity because that person wasn’t authorized to discuss details of Olbermann’s dismissal.

“We are confident that our viewers will be able to count on Gov. Spitzer to deliver critical information on a daily basis,” Gore and Hyatt said in their “open letter” to viewers.    ”Spitzer is a wife scamming whore who fucks hookers  but he is the best left winger we could find.”

In a statement posted online, Olbermann countered that “the claims against me implied in Current’s statement are untrue and will be proved so in the legal actions I will be filing against them presently.”  Sadly, Olbermann has no lawyer money.  He is shit outta luck.  They have so much dirt against him that he will not have the balls to show his face in court.

He said he had been attempting “for more than a year” to resolve his differences with Gore and Hyatt internally, “while I’ve not been publicizing my complaints.” Instead of “investing in a quality news program,” he said, his bosses “thought it was more economical to try to get out of my contract.”    But Olbermann neglected to say that on top of his childish bashing of the right wing — nobody was watching — not even the liberalist liberals.  NOBODY LIKES HIM!!!!

He called his decision to join Current “a sincere and well-intentioned gesture on my part, but in retrospect a foolish one.”    Yeah, foolish for everybody who invested in this floor peeing psychopath who belongs in a state hospital!

The rupture between Olbermann and his bosses echoed Olbermann’s past employment history. At NBC there was ongoing friction between the brash host and his bosses, just as there had been at earlier jobs as far back as Olbermann’s star-making, often tumultuous turn as a “SportsCenter” anchor at ESPN in the 1990s.      Olbermann is insane and he should not be on TV — this should end any further speculation.

Just weeks before his exit from MSNBC, Olbermann was nearly fired but instead was suspended for two days without pay for violating an NBC News policy by donating to three political campaigns.

At the heart of his grievance with MSNBC, as he later explained it, was the media consolidation that he felt threatened his independence on the air.

In January 2011, Comcast Corp., the giant cable operator, acquired a controlling stake in Olbermann’s already huge employer, NBCUniversal.

The night of Jan. 21, Olbermann told his viewers he was leaving. He said, a bit cryptically, that “there were many occasions, particularly in the last two and a half years, where all that surrounded the show — but never the show itself — was just too much for me.”

After that, Current, the privately held network co-founded in 2005 by former Vice President Gore and Joel Hyatt, seemed the perfect fit: It is an independent media outlet.

“Nothing is more vital to my concept of a free media than news that is produced independent of corporate interference,” Olbermann said at the announcement of his coming to Current.

Current was then beginning its effort to redefine itself after ditching its original concept as the go-to site for viewer-generated short videos.

Since “Countdown” premiered, Current has fleshed out its prime-time lineup of liberals with “The Young Turks,” hosted by Cenk Uygur, and “The War Room” with former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm.

This week, it introduced a six-hour morning talk block, with live simulcasts of the radio programs “The Bill Press Show” and “The Stephanie Miller Show.”

___

 

Mega Millions Jackpot numbers lead to Violence and DEATH in New Jersey!

Flora Vawn Butlers, 88, was nearly butchered to death last night in Cherry Hill, New Jersey (USA) by  her best friend Velma Cruthers 82, when Cruthers noticed that a few of Flora’s Mega Millions lottery tickets had some numbers that matched the numbers on her tickets.  She was so enraged that she picked up a meat cleaver and started hacking away at her friend until Flora’s sceams alerted a neighbor who burst into the home and restrained the attacker.

“She stole my numbers ,” screamed Velma Cruthers as she was hauled away – strapped to a gurney and put in an ambulance.

“They were my numbers!  She knew I always played number 46  and 27 in my Mega Millions.  She should die.  I hope I killed her.”

Luckily Flora Vawn-Butlers survived the attack but doctors expect she will have to have weeks of rehabilitation.  Several tendons in her neck were damaged by the attack and a few pieces of veal that were on the cleaver may have caused an infection when they entered deep into the muscle.

“Deep slicing wounds inflicted by an instrument where there is already animal meat, significantly raise the chance that she (Vawn-Butlers) will develop mad cow disease, but at this stage of her life it doesn’t really make a whole lot of difference,” said Dr. Murray Holiday who was the attending physician where the butchered lottery player was treated and eventually admitted.

This is not the only incident where a Mega Millions frenzy about numbers caused injury.

In Union City, New Jersey, a Weehawken man was shot and killed  in a lottery store when the man behind him heard him rattle off a few numbers that may or may not have matched a few of his.

According to eyewitnesses,  62-year-old Hector Klinemin-Velez shoved 89-year-old Carlos Vermerrez away from the counter and said, “Those are my numbers.  I always play 11 and 22.”

Witnesses then said that the old man replied meekly, “I play my late wife’s birthday 11th month 1922.”

Further reports say that this plea for lottery pity only served to further anger Klinemen-Velez and he took out his 357 Magnum and pumped 6 rounds into the old man’s head killing him instantly.

According to police, one woman screamed, “He just shot him with a 357 and he shot him 6 times!”   As Vermerrez lay dead on the floor in a huge puddle of blood in front of the befuddled Hindu man at the lottery terminal, the store was overrun with people who started playing the numbers 3-5-7 or 35- 7 or 3- 57 and then the number 6 as their jackpot number.   When the ambulance came it was too late for Vermerrez but frenzied lottery players ran to the curb to write down the ambulance number and license plate.

“I know that a man died,” said Doris Marcanttoti of Union City who is a devout lottery play and Catholic, “but if any of these numbers come out and I come outta this with 500 million, I am going to pay off that guy’s bail and help him with a lawyer.  You just don’t go around playing other people’s numbers.  I don’t give a shit if it was his dead wife’s birthday or not.  If I had a gun and he played my grandkid’s birthdays I would have shot the old son of a bitch too.”

According to psychiatrist, Dr. Dean Traherne, “The thought of $500 million is too much to handle for some people.  They actually think they own certain numbers and they will do anything to protect their property.  In this case one old lady ended up with hatchet slices and veal in her neck, and another old man died just because he wanted to win a few bucks.”

A spokesman for LPA “Lottery Players Advocacy” said that they “expect several more deaths and injuries before tonight’s drawing.  If there is no winner tonight and the drawing goes on into next week, there could be thousands killed.”

The Damien Zone agrees that money cannot buy you happiness, but in this case it can buy you death.  If, however, you play by the rules and etiquette, and don’t steal numbers from your friends, you might get out of this lottery drawing alive.

 

 

AOL mail is down today because AOL SUCKS!

If you are trying to access your AOL.com mail — forget it — it doesn’t work.  AOL is currently not working and one wonders when the day will finally come when this relic of the internet packs it in for good.   AOL is now a slave to Huffington and the once giant of internet email is now a sad vestige of its former self.

I urge all AOL people who cling to that old email address to simply drop it and stay away from AOL.   Using AOL for mail is like having cancer and going to a woman who heals with crystals.

Forget it.   Get a Gmail account — Yahoo is also out of the question because nothing on yahoo comes without having to watch a 15 second commercial which slows down your computer.  Maybe it’s better to simply get a paper, pen, stamp and envelope – use the post office.

Email was supposed to be simple — it is now anything but.

Jet Blue Pilot Had Alien Chip In His Head.

He went nuts on a Jet Blue flight and had to be restrained by passengers.  He ranted and raved about terrorists and the plane being “taken down.”  The plane he was supposed to be piloting had to make an emergency landing in Amarillo, Texas.  The co-pilot had to lock himout of the cockpit because he had a meltdown….but did he really?   Did the Jet Blue pilot who lit up the news yesterday really have a meltdown or is he just another in a long line of alien implanted people who’s chips are malfunctioning?

“It was rather confusing when a news reporter slipped up and said that the pilot was in a Texas hosiptal and under the care of the FBI.” said worlf famous physician and UFO expert, Dead Traherne MD.

“Who the hell has a meltdown and is put in the hands of the FBI?  That was a mjor slip up by a reporter who is probably himself implanted with a chip that was malfunctioning.

This pilot was a highly regimented professional, but what he didn’t know was that he was implanted with an alien chip which was removed earlier today by surgeons at an undisclosed Texas hospital.”

There are a rash of chip meltdowns lately — a few have taken place in the air and many have taken place in the news media.

More info as the story comes in.

Rachel Maddow Fired – Sue Simmons Leaving NBC To Take Over at MSNBC

“With Rachel Maddow you get a butchy looking hipster who acts more like a lesbian softball player than a reporter, but with Sue Simmons, you get something cable news never had — beauty, style, grace and the kind of experience that money cannot buy.” [Damien LeGallienne, 24 March 2102]

[Limoges, France 2:31] –   One on-air personality is a young Hipster lesbian with a manly haircut who got her job by winning a radio call in show, and the other is a beautiful veteran female journalist who has been an NBC anchor for over 30 years.  One is old and one is young, and both are about to get the axe from their jobs.  Guess which one isn’t really losing her job.

Usually in the world of TV, it’s always been, “out with the old and in with the new,”  but in this case it’s the other way around.  The young hipster of course is side-mouth-talking Rachel Maddow, and the old anchor/journalist is the legendary Sue Simmons.  The Hipster lesbian is going and the old lady is coming.   Huh.. you say?

For a few weeks it has been rumoured that NBC was pulling the plug on news anchor Sue Simmons, who at 68, has been the anchor and co-anchor of the NBC local news in New York City.  Simmons is a NYC metro area fixture since the 1970s.  She’s only flubbed a few times; once dropping the F bomb when she thought she was off the air, and another time when some viewers accused her of being a little tipsy during a broadcast.  The F bomb event is legendary, but the drunk rumors are baseless.

Viewers were angry because “Sue” has been part of their TV family for over 30 years.  Imagine that?  Thirty years with the same anchor — and despite her age, she is still as beautiful as ever.  As a matter of fact, she looks the same now as she did when she grabbed the anchor’s job back in 1981.  It’s freakish.

According to sources, the truth is that NBC-NY did not refuse to renew Simmons’ contract.  Simmons pulled the plug on herself and is hopping over to MSNBC in June when Rachel Maddow, who doesn’t even know it yet, gets her walking papers — something that will be made public within a few weeks.

“Maddow’s rating are VERY low,” said international news analyst and veteran news blogger Damien LeGallienne from his office in Limoges, France.

“In spite of MSNBC’s  relentless left wing countering of Fox News’ blatant right wing slant, nobody is watching the lefty.  Maddow’s numbers are so bad that even left wingers prefer to get angry by watching Fox News.  This is a psychological anomaly that marketers and experts seem to overlook.  In other words, Maddow, in spite of the fact that about 46% of viewers lean left, does not get these people to tune in.  They watched her in the beginning, but she didn’t hold them.

LeGallienne continued:

“TV is entertainment, even when it’s news or commentary, and the numbers show that left wingers are switching to FOX not because they agree, but because, to put it in simple terms,  they prefer to throw things through their TV screens and scream than to listen to Maddow’s nothingness.  (Sue) Simmons has star power to spare and Maddow doesn’t seem to have it.  If you think about it, it all kind of come out in the wash.  Simmons is a real journalist and TV personality whereas Maddow is simply an odd duck who won a radio contest.”

Noted Psychiatric Endocrinologist, Dr. Frangia Skell MD Phd,  went on to say that, “for some odd reason, many people with Maddow’s point of view are not attracted enough to her style of reporting and prefer to watch Fox News simply for the need to be anry and outraged — the rush.”

LeGallienne confirmed that Sue Simmmons will take over Maddow’s place in mid June 2012 despite the fact she is closing in on 70 years of age.

According to LeGallienne, “MSNBC is going to change its entire image and put up Sue Simmons simply for what she is – a woman who reports the news with style and grace and beauty and talent.  Talent seems to be the word that most insiders agree upon.  Sue has plenty to spare and Maddow has none — if you believe in charts and graphs.”

In a way you have to feel sorry for Rachel Maddow, but she’s young and intelligent.  She can always find another job on another network.  Just look at how great Keith Olbermann is doing on Current TV.

Facebook Etiquette: Things to know when you Facebook at 40.

“AGE IS JUST A NUMBER…THAT YOU KEEP TO YOURSELF!” [Damien, TheDamienZone.com]

Facebook is here to stay and while I think it’s a diabolical time stealer, it has a purpose.    It’s nice to meet up again with old friends and family and it’s fun to catch up on old times, but there are pitfalls that can beleaguer many Facebookers who sign on after the age of 40. 

 

You can make a lot of painful mistakes.  You can hurt your own –or  someone else’s  – self-esteem and you can just plain old screw up and create social awkwardness. 

I have put together a few thoughts here to help the over-40 crowd of Facebookers.  These are not only points to ponder, but I consider them to be steadfast rules to which you should always adhere when you’re Facebooking over 40.

1) TIME HAS NOT STOOD STILL:  The cute guy/gal you knew 25 or 35 years ago is now 25 or 35 years older.  In most cases you do not know what has happened to them in their lives or where they are socially, politically or intellectually.  Thirty years have passed so you must treat this person initially as a an old friend who, in reality, is actually a new acquaintance.

Don’t assume that Johnny Clark and Tiffany Brown are still the high-school hotties you knew.    There is a 60% chance that Johnny is  bald and chubby and hates his life, and Tiffany might look like a hag who has been through three divorces and serious mental/physical illness.  Don’t be shocked if you chance upon something unfortunate, and don’t automatically think,  “Thank god that didn’t happen to me.”  You don’t know what you look like — nobody does.

Never say something like, “Remember back in high school when we were so thin and perky?”   Maybe you are the fat pig and the other fat pig you are addressing doesn’t consider herself/himself to be a fat pig.    Remember, the only person who looks old or fat or bald or messed up or whatever is YOU until proven otherwise. Have some manners and turn your social filter up to maximum!

Odds are that you are in for a rude awakening when you see people from your 1985 high school graduating class.  If you want to feel old, look at your old friends and know that time has NOT stood still for you either.  Johnny Clark might not be the man of your dreams any longer, but he also might still be the arrogant  creep  who insulted you at the prom and made you cry.  Conversely, he might have been a real a-hole jock back then but now he’s changed into a great guy — but don’t count on it.   The same applies to Tiffany Brown.  Maybe she got fat and matronly.  Sure —  now she tells you that she thought you were cute in school.  Back when she was hot and sexy she didn’t give a sexocnd glance except to call you four-eyes or pizza face or metal-mouth.   Remember — they are NOT the same people.  There is a chance that perhaps they are somewhat the same, but bet against it.  This writer believes in redemption, but only to a point.

2) WHAT NOT TO SAY TO YOUR NEW BUT “OLD” ACQUAINTANCE ON THEIR FACEBOOK PAGE OR IN PRIVATE MESSAGES:  Remember, time has passed and when you speak on someone else’s page, you are essentially walking into their house, full of their friends and their family.

DO NOT  reference years or ages!  Some, or most  people, don’t want their age bandied about – because as they approach 50 men get really sensitive and women are already crippled by the thought that they are past their prime.   Just because you’re a loudmouth with confidence about how great your golf game still is at age 49, doesn’t mean the rest of your graduating class from Saint Lucy Queen of Death elementary school, or your friends from Algonquin Crystal Lake Sleep-Away Camp Summer of 1981, are as confident abou their age as you are — and who cares about your golf game.  Don’t be one of those “50 and loving it”  bores!

There is no need to post on a new add’s  Facebook wall — “Wow, can’t believe it’s been 34 years since we hung out at Grillo’s Pizza Parlor. ”  That might get you dropped by a Facebooker faster than Kim Karsdashian dropped what’s his name.   The rule is to never mention years or age or anything like that.  A simple, “haven’t seen you in a long time –you look great and you have great looking family,” will suffice — EVEN IF YOU DO NOT MEAN IT!!!!!

Do not put your graduating class years down on your eductaion profile.  Not only are you leaving youself wide open for identity theft, you are exposing the ages of all your school friends.  I have have my own old saying, “Age is just a number…that you keep to yourself.”

People have a thing called a “frame of reference” — look that up and learn it!

3) DON’T BE A STALKER or a STALKER ENABLER:  When a person you hardly knew from school or elsewhere sends you a Facebook friend request, it means that they actively searched for you.  If you have no mutual friends with that person, don’t believe their story about how they accidentally found you while looking for someone else.  They’re lying.  The truth is that they used to like you and they are suffering from unfulfilled fantasies or they have arrested development.   Consider that person to be a stalker — but not in a dangerous way– not yet anyway.

Sometimes you have to trust a little and perhaps you simply do not remember a really good childhood friend.  If that is indeed teh case, you might lean towards labeling the person as a stalker, but ask others you know and maybe the person was your roommate and great friend at camp for three years in a row.  You are getting on you know, and you just might have forgotten them.

Sadly, however, you should treat all fringe people from long ago as lonely stalkers.  They might be insane killers but the odds are that they are just lonely or curious about you — mostly it’s a compliment that comes 30 years too late.  It doesn’t hurt to add them as long as you know who they are – despite the fact that they are on the very last and un-autographed page of your yearbook.

You’re getting too old to be cliquish.  Maybe pimply Joey Dobski from high school is now a very rich guy who looks great.   There’s a gray area with stalkers and you need to have them as a Facebook friend for at least six months before you do any reciprocating.    If the stalker (he or she) looks really hot, don’t worry about moving in on them — your friends with more nerve will do it for you.  If you are curious, perhaps a group get-together in a public place is safe — but do not do anything CURIOUS if you are married.  You will screw up your life — trust me on that one!

4) A STALKER IS NOT THE SAME AS A PROWLER:  You must learn to recognize“The Prowler” and avoid their games at all costs.

A prowler is somebody you really know very well from your past who gradually befriends many of your Facebook friends but somehow manages to skirt around you.  You know they see you and they know that you know.   I consider these people to be the biggest jerks on Facebook.   Why didn’t they add you before they added Johnny Brown — a guy they barely knew?  Because they are jerks — and they always were jerks.

Prowlers circle around your internet space of social networking,  but they don’t send you an invite.  The obvious sign is when they add three  or four of your friends but they don’t add you despite the fact that they can see you.  They want you to see them, but they don’t want to make teh first move.  If you knew this person to be shy around you, perhaps you’re being the jerk and it wouldn’t hurt to say hi to them first.

This happens a lot with former boyfriends and girlfriends — but more often — and scream away if you want — women are the bigger prowlers by far!

This prowler thing applies very often to insecure women who prowl around a guy’s Facebook but don’t want to be “the one” to ask or say hello.  Guys are dumb and they don’t usually prowl.  If they want to add you, they add you.  There’s a weird difference between the male ego and the female ego.

Then you have your prowlers who will  say hello in a private message but still do not send a friend  request.  They want YOU to do it and they are content to add all of your friends without adding you.  I say IGNORE THEM.    Don’t think that maybe you should add them — NO!  They gradually infiltrated your cyber family and intentionally ignored you because they wanted YOU to ask THEM.   That’s something a person with problems will do — and if you think back you will probably remember that this person was like that when you knew them way back when.

5)  BEWARE OF THE WORDS  “IT’S COMPLICATED” BECAUSE IT REALLY IS:  When you are interested in an old flame or they are interested in you, beware always of the marital status listed as  “IT’S COMPLICATED” because nothing smells worse than that.

In my world, those words mean the following things.  a) I cheat on my wife but I have justified it in my own head.  b) I cheat on my husband but I have justified it in my own head.  c) I am so screwed up in a relationship that you should stay away from me at all costs.  d) I am involved or like to be involved in strange relationships.  e)  Run for your life.  f) I’m broke and I’m a loser.  g) I have a family but they don’t want anything to do with me.  h) I am in jail or have been in jail for bad stuff.  i) I will pretend to like you because I want money — AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST — I CHEAT ON MY SPOUSE — oh, wait, I said that already.

Perhaps the “It’s Complicated” crowd will get angry about these generalizations, but I am sure that if they look deep within themselves they will see that I am right.  They might even try to justify their behavior and scream, “But IT IS complicated, Damien!”  Sorry to hear it, pal.  Just keep all that complication on your side of the fence .  Anyone who dives in despite the “it’s complicated” disclaimer, deserves what they get.

6) RESPECT THE FACEBOOKER WHO HAS A PROFILE PIC OF THEMSELVES AND THEIR SPOUSE TOGETHER:  If you see an old friend and their profile pic is a family pic or a pic of them with their spouse, you should respect that and always address any correspondence to both husband and wife.  If you can’t do that, you can always add on like this….  “It was so nice to hear from you, Eileen and the pictures were great.  I hope Joe ( the husband) wasn’t bored by our school days reminiscing.” <—- catch on?  INCLUDE THE SPOUSE!  That’s why he is in the picture — in more ways than one.

7) DO NOT FRIEND YOUR FRIEND’S CHILDREN — IT’S CREEPY:   There is no reason why you have to add the children of a friend.   You’re getting to  the age where some of your childhood friends have kids who are 17 or 18 and there is no reason for you to be on their page whatsoever.  You will look like a creepy old weirdo.   The kid might be too polite to not accept your invite, and even if they invite you, it’s always best to say thanks but no thanks.  You can say, “You guys are so young and cool.  Why would you want an old crone like me on your page.  You’re a great kid — have fun!”   <—see how easy that is?

Okay, so I had a lot of help from my older experts when I wrote this.   If you would like to add another Facebook facctoid, please do so and I will add it on the comment page.  I want to know what I missed.  

Next week I will tackle the younger Facebookers — the one’s with whom I have the most experience.  That’s gonna suck!   

Damien